Free to start

Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs Tencent: Hy3

Try both on us. Starter credit covers your first requests, then one key routes Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct and Hy3. Switch by changing the model name.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct has more Credits provider routes. Tencent: Hy3 has the lower published input-plus-output rate. Their context windows are the same size. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.

$1.25545/1MQwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct cheapest route

$0.6963/1MTencent: Hy3 cheapest route

1276 msQwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct fastest measured p50 TTFT via databricks

not enough dataTencent: Hy3 fastest measured p50 TTFT

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructTencent: Hy3

Model idqwen/qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instructtencent/hy3

Publisher Alibaba Cloud Model Studio Tencent Cloud TokenHub

AI IQ — IQ 99#133

Context262,144 tokens262,144 tokens

Credits provider routes54

Cheapest route$1.25545/1M$0.6963/1M

Cached input$0.062641/1M to $0.07385/1M$0.034815/1M to $0.05275/1M

Privacy posturehas ZDR routeprovider posture varies

Fastest measured p50 TTFT1276 ms via databricksnot enough data

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime range100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct routes

Overview5 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Tencent: Hy3 routes

Overview4 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs Z.ai: GLM 5.338 combined provider routes
Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs Z.ai: GLM 5.237 combined provider routes
Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash37 combined provider routes
Tencent: Hy3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.337 combined provider routes
Tencent: Hy3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.236 combined provider routes
Tencent: Hy3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash36 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct33 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Tencent: Hy332 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="qwen/qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instruct",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct or Tencent: Hy3?

Is Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct or Tencent: Hy3 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $1.25545/1M for Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct and $0.6963/1M for Tencent: Hy3. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct or Tencent: Hy3 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 1276 ms for Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct and not enough data for Tencent: Hy3. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct and Tencent: Hy3 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between qwen/qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instruct and tencent/hy3. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.