Free to start

MiniMax: MiniMax M3 vs OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano

Try both on us. Starter credit covers your first requests, then one key routes MiniMax M3 and GPT-5 Nano. Switch by changing the model name.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

MiniMax: MiniMax M3 has more Credits provider routes and the larger context window. GPT-5 Nano has the lower published input-plus-output rate. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.

$1.25545/1MMiniMax: MiniMax M3 cheapest route

$0.47475/1MOpenAI: GPT-5 Nano cheapest route

859 msMiniMax: MiniMax M3 fastest measured p50 TTFT via fireworks

not enough dataOpenAI: GPT-5 Nano fastest measured p50 TTFT

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

MiniMax: MiniMax M3OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano

Model idminimax/minimax-m3openai/gpt-5-nano

Publisher MiniMax OpenAI

AI IQ IQ 114#64 IQ 95#146

Context1,048,576 tokens400,000 tokens

Credits provider routes141

Cheapest route$1.25545/1M$0.47475/1M

Cached input$0.05275/1M to $0.2532/1M$0.01/1M

Privacy posturehas ZDR routehas ZDR route

Fastest measured p50 TTFT859 ms via fireworksnot enough data

Highest measured throughput300 tok/s via wandbnot enough data

Recent route uptime range100.00%not enough data

Modes chat chat

MiniMax: MiniMax M3 routes

Overview14 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano routes

Overview1 Credits routes

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

MiniMax: MiniMax M3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.347 combined provider routes
MiniMax: MiniMax M3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.246 combined provider routes
MiniMax: MiniMax M3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash46 combined provider routes
MiniMax: MiniMax M3 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K342 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs MiniMax: MiniMax M340 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax: MiniMax M338 combined provider routes
MiniMax: MiniMax M3 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b38 combined provider routes
MiniMax: MiniMax M3 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B36 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="minimax/minimax-m3",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, MiniMax: MiniMax M3 or OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano?

MiniMax: MiniMax M3 has more Credits provider routes and the larger context window. GPT-5 Nano has the lower published input-plus-output rate. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.

Is MiniMax: MiniMax M3 or OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $1.25545/1M for MiniMax: MiniMax M3 and $0.47475/1M for OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is MiniMax: MiniMax M3 or OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 859 ms for MiniMax: MiniMax M3 and not enough data for OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test MiniMax: MiniMax M3 and OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between minimax/minimax-m3 and openai/gpt-5-nano. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.