OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Google: Gemma 4 31B

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Google: Gemma 4 31B: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway
Onebase URL to migrate
100sof models and routes
0prompt or output logs. Always.
Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.
Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.
Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the lower published input-plus-output rate, more Credits provider routes, the larger context window and the lower measured p50 time to first token.

$0.1266/1MDeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cheapest route
$0.45365/1MGoogle: Gemma 4 31B cheapest route
813 msDeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash fastest measured p50 TTFT via pearl
884 msGoogle: Gemma 4 31B fastest measured p50 TTFT via pearl

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGoogle: Gemma 4 31B
Model iddeepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flashgoogle/gemma-4-31b-it
Context1,048,576 tokens262,144 tokens
Credits provider routes1815
Cheapest route$0.1266/1M$0.45365/1M
Cached input$0.01/1M to $0.146118/1M$0.03798/1M to $0.26375/1M
Privacy posturehas provider E2EE routehas provider E2EE route
Fastest measured p50 TTFT813 ms via pearl884 ms via pearl
Highest measured throughput119 tok/s via novita308 tok/s via lightning
Recent route uptime range0.00% to 100.00%0.00% to 100.00%
Modes chat decide chat

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash routes

Google: Gemma 4 31B routes

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison
Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython
client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Google: Gemma 4 31B?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the lower published input-plus-output rate, more Credits provider routes, the larger context window and the lower measured p50 time to first token.

Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Google: Gemma 4 31B cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.1266/1M for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and $0.45365/1M for Google: Gemma 4 31B. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Google: Gemma 4 31B faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 813 ms for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and 884 ms for Google: Gemma 4 31B. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Google: Gemma 4 31B with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash and google/gemma-4-31b-it. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.

Workspace access

Sign in

Choose a sign in method to access your TrustedRouter workspace.

By signing in you agree to the terms of service and privacy policy.