OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

DeepSeek V3.1 vs Llama 4 Maverick Instruct

DeepSeek V3.1 vs Llama 4 Maverick Instruct: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

DeepSeek V3.1 has more Credits provider routes. Llama 4 Maverick Instruct has the lower published input-plus-output rate and the larger context window. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.

$1.266/1MDeepSeek V3.1 cheapest route

$1.055/1MLlama 4 Maverick Instruct cheapest route

2515 msDeepSeek V3.1 fastest measured p50 TTFT via novita

not enough dataLlama 4 Maverick Instruct fastest measured p50 TTFT

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

DeepSeek V3.1Llama 4 Maverick Instruct

Model iddeepseek/deepseek-v3.1meta-llama/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct-fp8

Publisher DeepSeek Cerebras

AI IQ IQ 99#111 —

Context131,072 tokens1,048,576 tokens

Credits provider routes53

Cheapest route$1.266/1M$1.055/1M

Cached input$0.13715/1M to $0.142425/1M$0.143217/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture variesprovider posture varies

Fastest measured p50 TTFT2515 ms via novitanot enough data

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime range100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

DeepSeek V3.1 routes

Overview5 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Llama 4 Maverick Instruct routes

Overview3 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

DeepSeek V3.1 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.232 combined provider routes
DeepSeek V3.1 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.331 combined provider routes
DeepSeek V3.1 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash30 combined provider routes
Llama 4 Maverick Instruct vs Z.ai: GLM 5.230 combined provider routes
DeepSeek V3.1 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K329 combined provider routes
Llama 4 Maverick Instruct vs Z.ai: GLM 5.329 combined provider routes
DeepSeek V3.1 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 073128 combined provider routes
Llama 4 Maverick Instruct vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash28 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="deepseek/deepseek-v3.1",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, DeepSeek V3.1 or Llama 4 Maverick Instruct?

Is DeepSeek V3.1 or Llama 4 Maverick Instruct cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $1.266/1M for DeepSeek V3.1 and $1.055/1M for Llama 4 Maverick Instruct. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is DeepSeek V3.1 or Llama 4 Maverick Instruct faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 2515 ms for DeepSeek V3.1 and not enough data for Llama 4 Maverick Instruct. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test DeepSeek V3.1 and Llama 4 Maverick Instruct with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between deepseek/deepseek-v3.1 and meta-llama/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct-fp8. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.