OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

Claude Opus 4.7 Coding vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K3

Claude Opus 4.7 Coding vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K3: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 has more Credits provider routes and the larger context window. A published Credits price comparison is not available for both models. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.

$31.65/1MClaude Opus 4.7 Coding cheapest route

$12.3435/1MMoonshotAI: Kimi K3 cheapest route

not enough dataClaude Opus 4.7 Coding fastest measured p50 TTFT

823 msMoonshotAI: Kimi K3 fastest measured p50 TTFT via wafer

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

Claude Opus 4.7 CodingMoonshotAI: Kimi K3

Model idanthropic/claude-opus-4.7-codingmoonshotai/kimi-k3

Publisher Anthropic Kimi

AI IQ — IQ 128#13

Context1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens

Credits provider routes024

Cheapest route$31.65/1M$12.3435/1M

Cached inputNot published$0.205725/1M to $1.6458/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas provider E2EE route

Fastest measured p50 TTFTnot enough data823 ms via wafer

Highest measured throughputnot enough data59 tok/s via gmi

Recent route uptime rangenot enough data50.00% to 100.00%

Modes chat messages chat

Claude Opus 4.7 Coding routes

Overview0 Credits routes

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 routes

Overview24 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.251 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.351 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash50 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K347 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b47 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K342 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K341 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K340 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="anthropic/claude-opus-4.7-coding",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, Claude Opus 4.7 Coding or MoonshotAI: Kimi K3?

Is Claude Opus 4.7 Coding or MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $31.65/1M for Claude Opus 4.7 Coding and $12.3435/1M for MoonshotAI: Kimi K3. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Claude Opus 4.7 Coding or MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for Claude Opus 4.7 Coding and 823 ms for MoonshotAI: Kimi K3. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Claude Opus 4.7 Coding and MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between anthropic/claude-opus-4.7-coding and moonshotai/kimi-k3. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.